Legal Opinion

State v. White

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided August 5, 1986No. 8626SC171PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARTIN, Judge.

The record on appeal lists three assignments of error. Two of the assignments of error are followed by reference to an exception and a page number in the trial transcript, the other assignment of error refers only to page numbers in the transcript. We have searched the record and the verbatim transcript, however, and nowhere therein do any of the exceptions appear except under the purported assignments of error.

Rule 10 of the North Carolina Rules of Appellate Procedure provides, in pertinent part,(a) Function in Limiting Scope of Review. Except as otherwise provided in this Rule…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Chambers v. MaroneySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. New York v. ClassSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. United States v. JohnsSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. State v. OliverSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. BellamyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
  2. State v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
  3. Travelers Indemnity Co. v. MarshburnCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988
  4. State v. BECOATSCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004
  5. State v. Castaneda-PenaCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2017

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API