State v. Gilbert
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
HILL, Judge.
The defendant contends that the jury received evidence in violation of her constitutional right to confront all witnesses against her and to receive a trial before an impartial jury panel and that she was thereby entitled to a new trial. G. S. 15A-1240 permits impeachment of a verdict as follows:(a) Upon an inquiry into the validity of a verdict, no evidence may be received to show the effect of any statement, conduct, event, or condition upon the mind of a juror or concerning the mental processes by which the verdict was determined.(c) After the jury has dispersed, the testimony…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
- State v. . DegraffenreidSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
- State v. . HartSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
- State v. MoyeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971
- State v. . ChampionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. BonneySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
- State v. RosierSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988
- Pinckney v. Van DammeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994
- State v. BaubergerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2006
- State v. BuckomCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1997
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.