Legal Opinion

Walls v. Armour Pharmaceutical Co.

District Court, M.D. Florida

Decided July 19, 1993No. 89-1705-CIV-T-23BPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION RE ARMOUR’S RULE 50 MOTION FOR JUDGMENT AS A MATTER OF LAW

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Page

I. Standard for Rule 50 Motions............................................1470

II. Armour's Statute-of-Limitation Defense....................................1470

A. The Applicable Statute of Limitation...................................1472

B. Application of the Products Liability Statute of Limitation...............1474

1. Relevant Case Law................................................1474

2. Discussion.........................................................1476

III. Armour’s “Learned Intermediary” Defense…

2Cases cited56 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. The Boeing Company v. Daniel C. ShipmanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
  3. Richard Leander Ferebee, Jr. v. Chevron Chemical CompanyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1984
  4. Gooding v. University Hosp. Bldg., Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1984
  5. Wyeth Laboratories v. ReyesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. R.F. v. Abbott LaboratoriesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2000
  2. Raskin v. Community Blood Centers of South Florida, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997
  3. Walls v. Armour Pharmaceutical Co.District Court, M.D. Florida · 1993
  4. R.F. v. Abbott LaboratoriesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API