Legal Opinion

Gerard v. Sanner

Montana Supreme Court

Decided February 9, 1940No. 7,914PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Erickson

This is an appeal from the judgment of the district court of Silver Bow county. Trial of the cause was had before a jury. At the conclusion of plaintiff’s case a motion for nonsuit was made and denied. On motion of the defendants below, at the conclusion of all of the testimony, a directed verdict for the defendants was ordered. The appeal is from the judgment based on that directed verdict. A motion for new trial was made and denied.

The plaintiff, Harry Gerard, was during the time of the transaction herein attorney in fact for W. A. Clark, Jr. On behalf of Clark, Gerard entered into certain…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Masser v. the London Operating Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1932
  2. Lindblom v. Employers' Liability Assurance Corp.Montana Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Staff v. Montana Petroleum Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1930
  4. Marfield v. Cincinnati, D. & T. Traction Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1924
  5. Mundt v. MallonMontana Supreme Court · 1938

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Butler Manufacturing Co. v. J & L IMPLEMENT CO.Montana Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Norwest Bank South Dakota, N.A. v. VennersSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Brothers v. Town of Virginia CityMontana Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Cedar Creek Oil & Gas Co. v. Fidelity Gas Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1957
  5. Westergard v. PetersonMontana Supreme Court · 1945

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API