Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Doe v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided September 28, 2016No. 2D16-1328, 2D16-1399, 2D16-1402, 2D16-1403, 2D16-1408, 2D16-1410, 2D16-1434, 2D16-1560, 2D16-1561, 2D16-1562, 2D16-1563, 2D16-1564, 2D16-1565, 2D16-1566, 2D16-1567Published

1ConcurrenceWallace, Judge

I concur fully in Judge Black’s well-reasoned majority opinion and in the certification of the question to the Florida Supreme Court. I write separately to explain why I think that the manner in which the trial judge has exercised his authority to conduct involuntary placement hearings is unwarranted. I also explain why I believe that conducting such hearings remotely by videoconference is inappropriate and ill-advised. Finally, I suggest that the appropriate rules committees of The Florida Bar should promptly draft and submit to the Florida Supreme Court proposed rules that will delineate…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. BergstromMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1988
  2. Harrell v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1998
  3. State, Department of Juvenile Justice v. SoudDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997
  4. 1-888-Traffic Schools v. Chief Cir. JudgeSupreme Court of Florida · 1999
  5. Norris v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API