Legal Opinion

Bone v. Albrecht

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided May 17, 1948No. 10583Published

1Per curiam

This case was heard on the record, briefs and oral argument of counsel; and it appearing that the findings of fact of the trial court are not clearly erroneous; and no error appearing in the Court’s conclusions of law, Sect. 2695(a) (c), Tennessee Code Supplement 1941; Inter-City Trucking Co. v. Daniels, 181 Tenn. 126, 178 S.W.2d 756; Huntsman Brothers, Inc., v. Grocers Baking Co., 12 Tenn.App. 535; Main Street Transfer & Storage Co. v. Smith, 166 Tenn. 482, 63 S.W.2d 665; and the issue of excessive damages being one for the District Court upon the motion for a new trial, Chapman & Dewey…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Inter-City Trucking Co. v. DanielsTennessee Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Main Street Transfer & Storage Co. v. SmithTennessee Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Sinclair Refining Co. v. BennettCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1941
  4. Huntsman Bros., Inc. v. Grocers Baking Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1931
  5. Chapman & Dewey Lumber Co. v. HanksCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API