Bone v. Albrecht
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Per curiam
This case was heard on the record, briefs and oral argument of counsel; and it appearing that the findings of fact of the trial court are not clearly erroneous; and no error appearing in the Court’s conclusions of law, Sect. 2695(a) (c), Tennessee Code Supplement 1941; Inter-City Trucking Co. v. Daniels, 181 Tenn. 126, 178 S.W.2d 756; Huntsman Brothers, Inc., v. Grocers Baking Co., 12 Tenn.App. 535; Main Street Transfer & Storage Co. v. Smith, 166 Tenn. 482, 63 S.W.2d 665; and the issue of excessive damages being one for the District Court upon the motion for a new trial, Chapman & Dewey…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Inter-City Trucking Co. v. DanielsTennessee Supreme Court · 1944
- Main Street Transfer & Storage Co. v. SmithTennessee Supreme Court · 1933
- Sinclair Refining Co. v. BennettCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1941
- Huntsman Bros., Inc. v. Grocers Baking Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1931
- Chapman & Dewey Lumber Co. v. HanksCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1939