Legal Opinion

State v. Montgomery

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided January 12, 1973No. 2473PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HAYS, Chief Justice.

Pursuant to a plea bargain, the defendant, James Montgomery, pleaded guilty to possession of heroin, and received a sentence of not less than five nor more than seven years, to run concurrently with the sentence which defendant was then serving in another case. His appeal raises only one issue — namely, whether the requirements of Boykin v. Alabama, 395 U.S. 238, 89 S.Ct. 1709, 23 L.Ed.2d 274, were met.

Defendant argues that the states must comply with the “spirit” of Federal Criminal Rule 11 and that the trial judge’s interrogation of the defendant fell short of that…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. State v. PhillipsArizona Supreme Court · 1972
  3. State v. FerrellArizona Supreme Court · 1972
  4. State v. KuhlmanCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1971

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. DensonArizona Supreme Court · 1973
  2. State v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API