Legal Opinion

917 LUSK, LLC v. City of Boise

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided February 10, 2015No. 41214PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HORTON, Justice.

This case arises from 917 Lusk, LLC’s (Lusk) petition for judicial review of the Boise City Council’s (City Council) decision granting a conditional use permit for Royal Boulevard Associates, LP (Royal) to build an apartment complex. The Ada County district court affirmed the City Council’s decision and Lusk timely appealed. We reverse the decision of the district court.

I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

In the fall of 2011, Royal’s predecessor in interest applied for permission to build a 352,000 square foot, five-story, multi-family apartment complex called River Edge…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Price v. PAYETTE CTY. BD. OF CTY. COM'RSIdaho Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Evans v. Teton CountyIdaho Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Hawkins v. Bonneville County Board of CommissionersIdaho Supreme Court · 2011
  4. Jasso v. CAMAS COUNTYIdaho Supreme Court · 2011
  5. City of Boise v. Ada CountyIdaho Supreme Court · 2009

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Colafranceschi v. Moody (In re Prefiling Order Declaring Vexatious Litigant)Idaho Supreme Court · 2019
  2. Neighbors for the Preservation of the Big & Little Creek Community v. Board of County CommissionersIdaho Supreme Court · 2015
  3. Hungate v. Bonner CountyIdaho Supreme Court · 2020
  4. Reese v. City of BlackfootIdaho Supreme Court · 2023
  5. Rouwenhorst v. Gem CountyIdaho Supreme Court · 2021

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API