Legal Opinion
Shreveport Laundries v. Sherman
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided April 3, 1942No. 6449PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Plaintiff instituted this suit against T.G. Kidd, a laundry driver and former employee of plaintiff, and his surety or bondsman, H.A. Sherman. The alleged indebtedness arose out of a shortage in Kidd's account with plaintiff. It was the duty of Kidd under his employment to solicit laundry, dry cleaning, etc., for plaintiff, to pick it up, deliver it and to collect for the services. The contract sued on was entered into by plaintiff, Kidd and his bondsman or guarantor on August 4, 1934, and is as follows:
"This agreement entered into by and between Shreveport Laundries, Inc., a Louisiana…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Lachman & Jacobi v. Henry Block & Bro.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1895
- Orleans & J. Ry. Co. v. International Const. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1903
- McGuire v. WooldridgeSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1843
- Wells v. Fidelity & Deposit Co. of MarylandSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1919
- New Orleans Canal & Banking Co. v. HaganSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1846
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Magnolia Petroleum Co. v. HarleyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1943
- Talbert v. Bounds & AllenLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1960
- Prestigiacomo v. Phoenix Insurance Co. of HartfordLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1970
- C. & W. Construction Co. v. Travelers Indemnity Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1962
- First National Bank of Jefferson Parish v. Louisiana Purchase Corp.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1977
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.