Legal Opinion

Tindle v. Celebrezze

District Court, S.D. California

Decided November 26, 1962No. 2046-NDPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

YANKWICH, District Judge.

Aimer T. Tindle has instituted an action against the Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare who denied to plaintiff the right to old age benefits. Lengthy hearings were held before a trial Examiner before the Secretary’s order was made. The transcript of the proceedings covers nearly 200 pages.

The controversy turns around the birth date of the plaintiff. Indeed the entire argument is one of fact in which it is insisted that the Hearing Examiner and the Secretary erred in concluding that the petitioner-plaintiff was not so old as she claims to be.

The provisions of…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
  2. Commissioner v. DubersteinSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  3. Graver Tank & Mfg. Co. v. Linde Air Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
  4. Guzman v. PichiriloSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  5. Riley v. New York Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Bennett v. SchweikerDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1982
  2. Pinto-Vidal v. Attorney GeneralDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1987
  3. Hamlin v. FinchDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 1970
  4. Rodgers v. CohenDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1968
  5. Bennett v. SchweikerDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1982

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API