Legal Opinion

Adams Newark Theatre Co. v. City of Newark

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided November 5, 1956Published

1Opinion of the Court

22 N.J. 472 (1956)

126 A.2d 340

ADAMS NEWARK THEATRE CO., A CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,

v.

CITY OF NEWARK, ET AL., DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS. I. HIRST ENTERPRISES, INC., A CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,

v.

CITY OF NEWARK, ET AL., DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Argued October 15, 1956.

Decided November 5, 1956.

Mr. Jacob M. Goldberg argued the cause for the appellants (Mr. Vincent P. Torppey, attorney, Mr. Joseph A. Ward, on the brief).

Mr. Robert L. Hood argued the cause for the respondent Adams Newark Theatre Co.

Mr. Henry H. Rubenson argued the cause for the respondent…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Thornhill v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. Winters v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  3. Joseph Burstyn, Inc. v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  4. Nash v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  5. Noble State Bank v. HaskellSupreme Court of the United States · 1911

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API