Legal Opinion

United States v. Gary France

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided April 7, 2015No. 14-2743PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TINDER, Circuit Judge.

In 2002, Dr. Gary France was ordered to pay $800,000 in restitution to victims of a fraudulent billing scheme he committed. By 2014, however, France had paid less than $11,000 toward that amount, so the government moved under the Mandatory Victims Restitution Act (MVRA), 18 U.S.C. § 3613(a), to garnish monthly payments of $16,296 from France’s privately purchased disability insurance policy. France maintains that these payments are at least partially exempt from garnishment, and his ex-wife, Theresa Duperon, seeks to exempt a portion of the payments that she receives for…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Kokoszka v. BelfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Barnhart v. Peabody Coal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 2003
  3. Andrus v. Glover Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Cisneros v. Alpine Ridge GroupSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  5. United States v. Raymond P. NovakCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Wisconsin Central Ltd. v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2016
  2. Homeland Insurance Company of New York v. Health Care Service CorporationDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API