Centennial Insurance Company v. Patterson
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
TORRUELLA, Circuit Judge.
In this insurance coverage dispute, appellant-insurer Centennial Insurance Company (“Centennial”) seeks review of the district court’s grant of summary judgment to appellee-insured veterinarian Dr. Robert Patterson. The district court declared that Centennial was obligated under an insurance policy to legally defend Patterson in a lawsuit instituted against him by Carol Murphy. After careful consideration, we affirm the grant of summary judgment in favor of Patterson.
I. Background
For the purposes of summary judgment the facts are as follows. Centennial is a New York…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Marx v. Hartford Accident and Indemnity CompanyNebraska Supreme Court · 1968
- Travelers Indemnity Co. v. DingwellSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1980
- John J. Donnelly v. Transportation Insurance Company, Continental Casualty CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1979
- Gibson v. Farm Family Mutual InsuranceSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1996
- Elliott v. Hanover Insurance Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1998
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- CARLYLE INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT, LLC v. ACE AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANYDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2016
- Pro Con, Inc. v. Interstate Fire & Casualty Co.District Court, D. Maine · 2011
- Snyder v. FishDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2022