Legal Opinion
Holness v. Chrysler Corp.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided October 30, 1995PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—In an action to recover damages for the alleged wrongful termination of the plaintiff’s employment, the defendant appeals from so much of an order of Supreme Court, Westchester County (Lefkowitz, J.), dated May 23, 1994, as denied its cross motion for a protective order and directed it to respond to the plaintiff’s first request for documents.
Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, with costs, the defendant’s cross motion for a protective order is granted, the plaintiff’s first request for documents dated January 8, 1993, is vacated, without prejudice to the plaintiff to…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Zambelis v. NicholasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- Muller v. SorensenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- Zimmer v. Cathedral School of St. Mary & St. PaulAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- Grossman v. LacoffAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
3Cited by23 opinions
- Bettan v. Geico General InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- Astudillo v. St. Francis-Beacon Extended Care Facility, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- Garcia v. Jomber Realty, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- Gonzalez v. International Business Machines Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- Kern v. City of RochesterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.