Legal Opinion
Farewell v. Milbank
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided October 18, 1954PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries and for expenses and loss of services, order granting plaintiffs’ motion for a preference in the trial of the action reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with $10 costs. There was no sufficient showing warranting the exercise of discretion in favor of granting the preference. (Of. Quinlan v. Schaefer Brewing Go., 279 App. Div. 805; O’Callaghan v. Brawley, 276 App. Div. 908; Braver V. Davis, 277 App. Div. 879; Pitrello v. Garro, 278 App. Div. 770, and Svei v. Minch Bros., 279 App. Div. 597.) The authorities relied…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Quinlan v. F. & M. Schaefer Brewing Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1952
- Svei v. Minck Bros. & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1951
- Pitrello v. GarroAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1951
- Belcher v. Erie RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1952
3Cited by4 opinions
- Sheehan v. BehrAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1956
- Di Carpio v. Babylon Milk & Cream Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1955
- Engongoro v. Di PalmaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1962
- Hamill v. New York State Gas & Electric Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1956