Brauch v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
KAROHL, Presiding Judge.
Movant-Appellant appears before this court pro-se in an effort to obtain a remand to the Circuit Court of Lincoln County with directions that the court conduct an eviden-tiary hearing on movant’s motion requesting post-conviction relief under Rule 27.26. He contends,
THE TRIAL COURT ERRED WHEN SUMMARILY DISMISSING APPELLANT’S THIRD RULE 27.26 MOTION ALLEGING HE WAS DENIED HIS RIGHT TO APPEAL FROM THE SUMMARY DISMISSAL OF HIS FIRST 27.-26 MOTION BECAUSE COUNSEL FAILED TO PERFECT AN APPEAL ALTHOUGH REQUESTED BY APPELLANT TO DO SO.
The factual setting for this appeal may be…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Brauch v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1983
- Howard v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1973
- Nicholson v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1975
- State v. GraySupreme Court of Missouri · 1966
- Bibbs v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1972
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Thrift v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1988