Legal Opinion

In Re Winn

California Supreme Court

Decided March 6, 1975No. Crim. 18298PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

WRIGHT, C. J.

Petitioner Ray L. Winn seeks a writ of habeas corpus claiming he is illegally incarcerated following alleged parole violations without having been accorded parole revocation hearings as mandated by Morrissey v. Brewer (1972) 408 U.S. 471 [33 L.Ed.2d 484, 92 S.Ct. 2593] and In re La Croix (1974) 12 Cal.3d 146 [115 Cal.Rptr. 344, 524 P.2d 816]. We hold petitioner is not entitled to relief since probable cause to suspend parole and hold only a full revocation hearing was established on the basis of two convictions each charged as independent grounds for revocation, thereby…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. People v. VickersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  4. In Re LawCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  5. In Re PrewittCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. In Re RodriguezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  2. In Re StanleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
  3. People v. MartinezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
  4. People v. JourneyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
  5. In Re CarrollCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API