Legal Opinion

Fairey v. Haynes

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided August 14, 1915No. 9159PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Before Maurdin, J., Orangeburg, Action by W. C. Fairey against William Haynes. From judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals. cites: 97 S. C. 289; 96 S. C. 355; 47 S. C. 489; 50 S. C. 161; 51 S. C. 453. submits: The exclusion of evidence was within the discretion of trial-judge: 98 S. C. 123.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Watts.

This was an action for claim and delivery, brought by plaintiff for the recovery of certain personal property. The plea of defendant was a general denial and payment. The case was tried before Judge Mauldin and a jury at Orange-burg, S. C., October term of Court, 1914, and resulted in a verdict in favor of the plaintiff for the property sued for, or the value thereof, in case property could not be delivered, $297. After entry of judgment defendant appeals, and by seven exceptions seeks reversal. Exceptions 2 and 3 are as follows:

2.…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Fairey v. HaynesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1917

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API