Marks v. McKenna
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM **
Petitioner-Appellant Thomas Marks appeals the denial of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus. As the facts and procedural history are familiar to the parties, we do not recite them here except as necessary to explain our disposition.
Petitions for habeas corpus relief such as this one are governed by the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act (AEDPA), 28 U.S.C. § 2254(d). Lindh v. Murphy, 521 U.S. 320, 322, 117 S.Ct. 2059, 138 L.Ed.2d 481 (1997). Under AEDPA, we may not grant habeas relief unless the last reasoned state court adjudication, here that of the Washington…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Cuyler v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Lindh v. MurphySupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Richard Adams Hovey v. Robert L. Ayers, Jr., Acting Warden, California State Prison at San QuentinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- Anthony Alexander Campbell v. Bert RiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- United States v. Jess A. RodriguesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.