Legal Opinion

In re Petersen

District Court, N.D. California

Decided July 6, 1899No. 2,925PublishedCited by 9 opinions

In Bankruptcy.

1Opinion of the Court

I)E HAVEN, District Judge.

The certificate of the referee shows that, in the course of proceedings before him in said cause, the following question arose:

“The bankrupt heroin claimed the following articles as exempt, under sections 6 and 47 of the bankruptcy act, and section 690 of tbe Code of Civil Procedure of 1bo state of California, to wit, 50 bread pans, 4 bread peals, 45 dozen molds for bread and cakes, 30 bread boxes, 2 long benches, 1 square bench, 1 square table, 2 triangles for mixing dough, 4 bowie knives, 1 table knife, 2 sieves, 1 lot ornamenting tools, 2 bread scales with…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In re Estate of McManusCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  2. In re RobbCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Lopez v. NaegelinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933
  2. Kono v. MeekerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
  3. Twining v. TaylorCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
  4. In re SandersonDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1955
  5. Laguna v. QuiñonesSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1916

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API