Legal Opinion

Leddy v. Enos

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 24, 1893No. 621PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court, King County.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Anders, J.

It is only necessary for us to decide one of the questions presented by the record in this case, and that is as to the sufficiency of the complaint. The case was brought to recover damages for a breach of the covenants of a deed made by appellant to the respondent. There was no special covenant against incumbrances in said deed. The only covenant relied upon and set out in the complaint was substantially as follows:

‘ ‘And the said party of the first part, his heirs, executors and administrators, does by these presents covenant, grant and…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Cemansky v. FitchSupreme Court of Iowa · 1903
  2. Williams v. HewittWashington Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Polak v. MattsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1912
  4. George A. Lowe Co. v. Simmons Warehouse Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1911

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API