Legal Opinion · Concurrence

State v. Melanson

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided October 15, 1956Published

1ConcurrenceWebber, J.

I concur fully in the opinion of the court. I note that in the dissenting opinion there is no suggestion that State v. *176Inness, 53 Me. 536, has been overruled and no effort is made to distinguish it from the case at bar. I am satisfied that it controls the situation now before us. There, as here, the State filed a demurrer to a dilatory plea in bar. There, as here, the demurrer was sustained and the respondent took exceptions. There, as here, there was a proper order to plead over which was ignored by the respondent. There, as here, there was no adjudication of guilt or imposition of sentence…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. InnessSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1866
  2. Stowell v. HooperSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1922

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API