Legal Opinion

Dickens v. Williams

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided May 14, 1842PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Covenant. Case 122. Error to the Henry Circuit.

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Robertson

The affirmation in the bill of sale of the Jack, that it was “a good and sure foal geiler,” imports a covenant of warranty that it was so: Ditto vs Helm, (2 J. J. M. 129.) Such expressions in a written contract, when unqualified as in this case, by any. thing else therein, should be deemed a part of the contract, and therefore stipulatory; thereby the vendor, of course, agreed that the jack was as described, and consequently that agreement was a covenant to that effect.

Proof that the jack was altogether impotent during the whole season succeeding the sale in January, was not inadmissible or…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Lamme v. GreggCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1858

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API