State v. Franks.

The defendant is indicted for peddling without license to do so. Upon the trial at Spring Term, 1900, of I)aRe Superior Court, the jury found the following special verdict: “We, the jury impanneled to try-the issue in this case, find the following facts as a special verdict: (1) that the defendant, Nathan Franks, is employed by L. Lavan- : stein as salesman; that said Lavanstein is conducting a, dry- goods and notions and clothing mercantile business in Eliza*beth City, N. C., and during the latter part of April, 1900, defendant spent three days going from house to house in the above county,…