Legal Opinion
Allen v. CITY OF CHICKASHA
Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma
Decided June 4, 2009No. Case Number: 105872PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
CAROL M. HAN SEN, Presiding Judge.
T1 This appeal arises from a controversy between the City of Chickasha (City) and a property owner, Richmont Development (Richmont), regarding two residential rental properties which City deemed dilapidated. The trial court found Richmont, and Marianne Allen (Allen) individually as the sole shareholder .in Richmont, violated 12 O.S. Supp.2004 § 2011 (hereafter § 2011) by filing this action in bad faith to "annoy and harass" City. The court awarded City $3,589.62 in attorney fees as sanctions, "jointly and severally," against Richmont and Allen, individually.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- State Ex Rel. Tal v. City of Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2002
- Funnell v. JonesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985
- Gilbert v. Security Finance Corp. of OklahomaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2006
- Hammonds v. Osteopathic Hospital Founders Ass'nSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Redcorn v. KnoxCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2014