Legal Opinion

David v. Marbut-Williams Lumber Co.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided April 23, 1924No. 15159PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBell, J.

“Before a materialman’s lien for materials furnished to a contractor to improve the real estate of another can be foreclosed, there must be a judgment for the price of such materials in his favor, against the contractor, or the contractor must be sued concurrently with the owner of-the property improved, in the foreclosure proceedings.” Pike Lumber Co. v. Mitchell, 132 Ga. 675, 676 (64 S. E. 998, 26 L. R. A. (N. S.) 409). The materialman in the instant case adopted the “concurrent” proceeding. The petition was filed on November 14, 1921, and alleged, among other things, that it was brought…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Rusk v. HillSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
  2. Lombard v. Trustees of the Young Men's Library Ass'n FundSupreme Court of Georgia · 1885
  3. Hipp v. Fidelity Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1907
  4. Southern Railway Co. v. Oliver & MorrowCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
  5. Peterson v. Georgia Railroad & Banking Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1896

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Dowling v. LesterCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1946
  2. Colonial Stores, Inc. v. FishelCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1981
  3. Beaver v. MagidCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1937
  4. The Jordan Company v. AdkinsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1961
  5. Swain v. Georgia Power & Light Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1933

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API