Clifford Family Ltd. Liability Co. v. Cox
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1DissentDonald L. Corbin, Justice
Appellant asks this court to reverse the chancellor’s ruling and strictly enforce the provisions of the protective covenant, without regard to the relative hardships to either party. The majority reverses the chancellor’s decision on the ground that the terms of the protective covenants are unambiguous and, thus, must be strictly enforced. While I do not take issue with the majority’s recitation of the general law on restrictive or protective covenants, I do not agree that every violation of a protective covenant mandates an injunction requiring removal of the offensive structure.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Hays v. WatsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1971
- Stuttgart Electric Co. v. Riceland Seed Co.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 1991
- Turpin v. WattsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1980
- Blevins v. WagnonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1984