Floyd v. City of Carencro
Louisiana Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
CONERY, Judge.
_JjIn this case, the plaintiff, Dominique Floyd (Mr. Floyd), seeks individual damages and damages on behalf of his minor children K.F. and N.F. resulting from an incident whereby Mr. Floyd was detained by officers from the Carenero Police Department who were responding to a “domestic in progress” call. After a trial on the merits, the trial cóurt found in favor of the defendants, the City of Carenero and Chief Carlos Stout, in his Official Capacity as Chief of Police of the City of Carenero, and dismissed plaintiffs’ case with prejudice. For the following reasons, we affirm.
*389FACTS…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Stobart v. State Through DOTDSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1993
- United States v. HensleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- State v. BeltonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1983
- Kem Search, Inc. v. SheffieldSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1983
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.