Legal Opinion

Floyd v. City of Carencro

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided October 1, 2014No. 14-268Published

1Opinion of the Court

CONERY, Judge.

_JjIn this case, the plaintiff, Dominique Floyd (Mr. Floyd), seeks individual damages and damages on behalf of his minor children K.F. and N.F. resulting from an incident whereby Mr. Floyd was detained by officers from the Carenero Police Department who were responding to a “domestic in progress” call. After a trial on the merits, the trial cóurt found in favor of the defendants, the City of Carenero and Chief Carlos Stout, in his Official Capacity as Chief of Police of the City of Carenero, and dismissed plaintiffs’ case with prejudice. For the following reasons, we affirm.

*389FACTS…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Stobart v. State Through DOTDSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1993
  3. United States v. HensleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. State v. BeltonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1983
  5. Kem Search, Inc. v. SheffieldSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1983

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API