Legal Opinion

Continental Insurance Company v. Echols

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided February 8, 1978No. 54965PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Bell, Chief Judge.

Plaintiffs brought separate suits -to recover on judgments they had obtained against a known uninsured motorist. The defendant insurer pleaded that plaintiffs had not established legal liability of an uninsured motorist as required by Code Ann. § 56-407.1 (g). The cases were consolidated for trial. The court made findings of fact and conclusions of law and entered judgments in favor of plaintiffs. The defendant appeals.

The pertinent facts were stipulated. The plaintiffs were insured under a policy containing uninsured motorist coverage. They were injured in a collision with…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. GirtmanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1966
  2. Sale v. LeachmanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1963
  3. Londeau v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. LeFevre v. WestberrySupreme Court of Alabama · 1991
  2. Curlee v. Mock Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1985
  3. Williams v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1988
  4. Kent v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1998
  5. P. L. A. v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1984

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API