Legal Opinion
Middleton v. Eubank
Court of Appeals of South Carolina
Decided April 19, 2010No. 4675PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtShort, J.
In this dispute involving the interpretation of a real property lease, Ernest Middleton, III, and Marjorie Middleton (collectively, Appellants), as co-trustees of the will of Ernest Middleton, Jr., appeal from the Master-in-Equity’s order finding in favor of Manly Eubank, 1625 Partnership, and Palmetto Ford, Inc. (collectively, Respondents), the lessees of the property owned by Ernest Middleton, Jr. We affirm.
FACTS
On July 28, 1983, Ernest Middleton, Jr. (Lessor) signed a lease with Eubank, individually and as President of Palmetto Ford, Inc., and Hugh Cannon (Lessees), whereby Middleton…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Futch v. McAllister Towing of Georgetown, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1999
- Felts v. Richland CountySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1991
- McGill v. MooreSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2009
- Duncan v. LittleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2009
- PIEDMONT INTERSTATE FAIR ASSN. v. City of SpartanburgSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1980
3Cited by4 opinions
- Ancor Hold v. Landon CaptlCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2024
- Bluffton Towne Center, LLC v. Gilleland-PrinceCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2015
- PALMETTO CO. v. McMahonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2011
- J & W Corporation v. Broad Creek MarinaCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2023