Legal Opinion

Alaniz v. Office of Personnel Management

District Court, D. Alaska

Decided August 25, 1982No. A81-72 CivPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

VON DER HEYDT, Chief Judge.

THIS CAUSE comes before the court on cross-motions for summary judgment. Jurisdiction exists pursuant to 5 U.S.C. § 702 (1976); 28 U.S.C. § 1331(a) (1976) (as amended by Pub.L. No. 96-486, 94 Stat. 2369); and 28 U.S.C. § 1346(a)(2) (1976).

I. FACTS

The suit raises challenges to administration of the cost-of-living allowance (hereinafter COLA) provided federal employees in the Anchorage, Alaska area. In essence, COLA is a federal program supplementing basic pay of employees living in designated non-foreign areas. The Office of Personnel Management…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Udall v. TallmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. Asarco, Inc. v. U. S. Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
  4. Richard A. Batterton, Secretary of Employment & Social Services of the State of Maryland v. F. Ray Marshall, Secretary of LaborCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
  5. Southern Railway Co. v. Seaboard Allied Milling Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Susan Alaniz, Appellants/cross-Appellees v. Office of Personnel Management, Appellees/cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
  2. Rodríguez v. Secretario de HaciendaSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API