Legal Opinion · Dissent

People v. Ritter

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided January 8, 1991No. Docket 116685Published

1DissentMichael J. Kelly, J.

It appears that the question boils down to whether a proceeding for probation revocation can be considered "pending” where the defendant has not been *713served or otherwise notified of the proceeding. The prosecutor argues that probation orders are at all times amendable under MCL 771.2(2); MSA 28.1132(2) on an ex parte basis with no requirement that defendant be given notice or opportunity to be heard regarding the amendment. People v Kendall, 142 Mich App 576, 579; 370 NW2d 631 (1985). Defendant says the proceedings, even ex parte proceedings, must be pending during the term of probation,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People v. KendallMichigan Court of Appeals · 1985
  2. People v. JacksonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API