Legal Opinion
Wurtzel v. Wurtzel
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided May 20, 1996PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
In an action for a divorce and ancillary relief, the plaintiff wife appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (DiNoto, J.), entered March 10, 1995, which denied her motions for, among other things, a protective order with respect to the subpoenas duces tecum and notices to take depositions upon oral examination issued by the defendant husband to four nonparty witnesses.
Ordered that the order is modified, on the law and the facts, by deleting the provision denying those branches of the motions which were for a protective order with respect to the subpoenas duces tecum and…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Kaye v. KayeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- Dioguardi v. St. John's Riverside HospitalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- King v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- Fox v. FoxAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- Flach v. FlachAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Kooper v. KooperAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Wolf v. WolfAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- Galgano v. GalganoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- Morganti v. MorgantiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010