Haas v. Gaddis
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from, District Court, Ch ehalis County. The facts are fully stated in the opinion. The taking by said sheriff of the entire property of JD. Mace & Company upon the writ of attachment or execution in case of I 11. Dawson v. J. D. Mace, was unlawful.
Read the full summary
Appeal from, District Court, Ch ehalis County. The facts are fully stated in the opinion. The taking by said sheriff of the entire property of JD. Mace & Company upon the writ of attachment or execution in case of I 11. Dawson v. J. D. Mace, was unlawful. Gibson v. Stevens, 7 N. H. 352; Wilson v. Conine, 2 Johns. 280; Paige v. Carpenter, 10 N. H. 77; Dow v-Sawyer, 12 N. H. 271, and 14 N. H. 9; Morrison v. Blod-gett, 8 N. H. 238. Especially if he afterward sell the whole property, as in this case. 1 Gall. 370; 15 Mass. 82. Such attachment was illegal and void against subsequent attachment by…
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Scott, J.
The defendants, Beckwith and Roderick,, appellees, move to strike the notice of appeal, and the statement of facts, and to dismiss the case for the following reasons: That no notice of appeal was given, and no notice to said appellees to appear at the time the statement of facts was settled; that the statement of facts is not connected with the transcript, or sufficiently identified to be considered in the case; that the transcript was not filed within the time prescribed by law; and that the instructions given by the court to the jury are not…
2Cited by43 opinions
- Finlay v. King's LesseeSupreme Court of the United States · 1830
- Stonestreet v. DoyleSupreme Court of Virginia · 1881
- Kentucky Mutual Insurance v. JenksIndiana Supreme Court · 1854
- Fuller v. Madison Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1875
- Irwin v. ZaneWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1879
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.