Legal Opinion

Kruze v. Keleher

New York Supreme Court

Decided October 25, 1961PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHarold Tessler, J.

Motion by the plaintiff to restrain pendente lite the payment by the New York City Employees’ Betirement System, hereinafter called the Betirement System, *757of her late husband’s accumulated salary deductions and cash death benefit to the defendant Marie Dominguez Martinez. The latter moves to dismiss the complaint for legal insufficiency.

The named beneficiary of the accumulated salary deductions and the one year’s cash death benefit payable by the Retirement System is the defendant Marie Dominguez Martinez, the first wife of the decedent, from whom he obtained a judgment of divorce in the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Wilcox v. . the Mutual Life Insurance Company of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1923
  2. Wilcox v. Mutual Life InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Kruze v. KeleherAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1962
  2. Davis v. Travelers Insurance CompaniesNew York Supreme Court · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API