Legal Opinion

People v. Giem

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided December 17, 2015No. Court of Appeals 13CA1964PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

JUDGE RICHMAN

1 A jury convicted Bryan Matthew Giem of first degree aggravated motor vehicle theft (aggravated motor vehicle theft), theft, menacing, and two counts of aggravated robbery. In this appeal, Giem argues that the Double Jeopardy Clause and section 18-1-308, C.R.8.2015, barred the People from prosecuting him for these offenses because he had already been prosecuted in California for the conduct underlying this case. We conclude that while the Double Jeopardy Clause did not bar Giem's prosecution in Colorado, section 18-1-808 barred his prose-ecution here for aggravated…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Heath v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Valdez v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1998
  3. Bostelman v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2007
  4. People v. DiazSupreme Court of Colorado · 2015
  5. People v. GladneyColorado Court of Appeals · 2010

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Peo v. SmithColorado Court of Appeals · 2024
  2. People v. GiemColorado Court of Appeals · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API