Legal Opinion

Bonewell v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided May 26, 2009No. 08-745CPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

SWEENEY, Judge.

In this case, plaintiff, as the former spouse of a deceased United States Air Force (“Air Force”) retiree, claims that she is entitled to annuity payments through the military’s Survivor Benefit Plan (“SBP”). Defendant has moved to dismiss plaintiffs complaint for lack of jurisdiction pursuant to Rule 12(b)(1) of the Rules of the United States Court of Federal Claims (“RCFC”). For the reasons set forth below, the court denies defendant’s motion.

I. BACKGROUND1

The SBP was enacted by Congress in 1972 to provide benefits to surviving spouses and dependent children…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  2. Arbaugh v. Y & H Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
  3. McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
  4. United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. United States v. SherwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1941

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Rosa D. Bonewell v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
  2. Bonewell v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
  3. Schussler v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2021
  4. Schussler v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API