United States v. Stagliano
District Court, District of Columbia
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
RICHARD J. LEON, District Judge.
The defendants — John Stagliano, John Stagliano, Inc., and Evil Angel Productions, Inc. — challenge the constitutionality of four federal statutes that criminalize the interstate trafficking of obscenity. They move to dismiss the Indictment charging them with offenses under 18 U.S.C. § 1462, 18 U.S.C. § 1465, 18 U.S.C. § 1466, and 47 U.S.C. § 223(d). In particular, they contend that these statutes are unconstitutionally vague and overbroad as applied to Internet speech. They also contend that the statutes are unconstitutional in light of…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Griswold v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Roth v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Miller v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Hamling v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- United States v. MeakinCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2019
- United States v. StaglianoDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010