Legal Opinion

United States v. Stagliano

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided February 19, 2010No. Criminal Action 08-93 (RJL)PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

RICHARD J. LEON, District Judge.

The defendants — John Stagliano, John Stagliano, Inc., and Evil Angel Productions, Inc. — challenge the constitutionality of four federal statutes that criminalize the interstate trafficking of obscenity. They move to dismiss the Indictment charging them with offenses under 18 U.S.C. § 1462, 18 U.S.C. § 1465, 18 U.S.C. § 1466, and 47 U.S.C. § 223(d). In particular, they contend that these statutes are unconstitutionally vague and overbroad as applied to Internet speech. They also contend that the statutes are unconstitutional in light of…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Griswold v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Roth v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  4. Miller v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Hamling v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. MeakinCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2019
  2. United States v. StaglianoDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API