Ammerman, Paul v. Seaman
District Court, W.D. Wisconsin
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN PAUL D. AMMERMAN, Plaintiff, OPINION AND ORDER v. 17-cv-800-wmc MARY SEAMAN, Defendant. On October 5, 2021, after a one-day jury trial, judgment was entered in favor of defendant Mary Seaman and this case was closed. (Dkt. #152.) Defendant then submitted a bill of costs for the $545.80 she paid in docketing fees and to obtain a transcript of plaintiff Paul D. Ammerman’s deposition, and a brief in support. (Dkt. ##153, 156.) Over plaintiff’s objection, the Clerk concluded that “it was reasonable for defendant to obtain a…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Robert Cengr v. Fusibond Piping Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998
- Richardson v. Chi. Transit Auth.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2019
- Jesse Anderson and Jestine Turnbough v. Roy GriffinCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005
- SCA Services, Inc. v. Lucky StoresCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1979
- National Organization for Wome v. Joseph ScheidlerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2014