Legal Opinion

Ammerman, Paul v. Seaman

District Court, W.D. Wisconsin

Decided December 30, 2021No. 3:17-cv-00800Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN PAUL D. AMMERMAN, Plaintiff, OPINION AND ORDER v. 17-cv-800-wmc MARY SEAMAN, Defendant. On October 5, 2021, after a one-day jury trial, judgment was entered in favor of defendant Mary Seaman and this case was closed. (Dkt. #152.) Defendant then submitted a bill of costs for the $545.80 she paid in docketing fees and to obtain a transcript of plaintiff Paul D. Ammerman’s deposition, and a brief in support. (Dkt. ##153, 156.) Over plaintiff’s objection, the Clerk concluded that “it was reasonable for defendant to obtain a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Robert Cengr v. Fusibond Piping Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998
  2. Richardson v. Chi. Transit Auth.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2019
  3. Jesse Anderson and Jestine Turnbough v. Roy GriffinCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005
  4. SCA Services, Inc. v. Lucky StoresCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1979
  5. National Organization for Wome v. Joseph ScheidlerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API