Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Bettman v. Miami Conservancy District

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided November 22, 1933No. 23326Published

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court

(Zimmerman, J.).

The right of the state to bring an original action in quo warranto in this court was upheld when a demurrer to the petition was overruled in State, ex rel. Bettman, Atty. Genl., v. Miami Conservancy District, 125 Ohio St., 201, 180 N. E., 893. We see no good reason for departing from the views there- expressed.

A summary of the essential allegations of the petition is contained in the opinion cited. Suffice it to say here that the state claims to be the owner in fee simple of three described tracts of land in Mad River township, Montgomery county, Ohio, aggregating…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State, Ex Rel. v. Conserv. Dist.Ohio Supreme Court · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API