Legal Opinion

Banks v. Harden

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided September 28, 1964No. 22625PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Head, Presiding Justice.

The petition for specific performance in the present case is entirely devoid of any allegations showing the value of the property so as to enable the court to determine that the contract sought to be enforced was fair, just, and equitable, and one that in good conscience should be performed, and the trial judge erred in overruling the general demurrers of the defendants. Coleman v. Woodland Hills Co., 196 Ga. 626 (27 SE2d 226); Ogletree v. Ingram & LeGrand Lumber Co., 207 Ga. 333 (3) (61 SE2d 480); Almand v. Williams, 208 Ga. 703 (69 SE2d 271); Ewing v. Paulk, 208 Ga.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Coleman v. Woodland Hills CompanySupreme Court of Georgia · 1943
  2. Ogletree v. Ingram & Legrand Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1950
  3. Ewing v. PaulkSupreme Court of Georgia · 1952
  4. Morgan v. MitchellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1952
  5. Sikes v. SimsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1956

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Moody v. MendenhallSupreme Court of Georgia · 1977
  2. Crown Corporation v. GalantiSupreme Court of Georgia · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API