Legal Opinion

State Board of Education v. Roanoke Railroad & Lumber Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 6, 1912PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal by defendant from Cline, J., at Fall Term, 1911, of WASHINGTON. Tbe facts are sufficiently stated in the opinion of the Court by Mr. Chief Justice Ciarle.

1Opinion of the Court

Clakk, 0. J.

-Revisal, 1693 (3), withdraws from being granted by the State all “marsh or swamp land, where the quantity of land in any one marsh or swamp exceeds 2,000 acres, or where, if of less quantity, the same has been surveyed by the State, or by the State Board of Education, with a view to draining and reclaiming the same.” This is an action to declare void certain grants embracing land which it is claimed came within the terms of the above section, and also to recover damages for timber cut by defendants on said land. The plaintiff did not ask to recover damages for timber cut more…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Britt v. Carolina Northern RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
  2. Board of Education v. MakelySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
  3. Horton v. Seaboard Air Line RailwaySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1907

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Mintz v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  2. Robinson v. . DaughtrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1916

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API