Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

D. Robert Autrey, Jr., an Individual, Cross-Appellants v. United States of America, Cross-Appellee

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided December 6, 1989No. 87-8916Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partClark, Circuit Judge

The majority’s analysis of this complex case is seemingly logical, but incomplete. There is no doubt that the investment programs created by Mr. Autrey offered incredible tax benefits to investors based on a small cash outlay. The programs arguably contain several of the classic elements of the very types of abusive tax shelters Congress intended to discourage by assessing civil penalties against promoters under section 6700. The abusive nature of these programs was extensively debated before the jury in a trial that lasted thirteen days. Arguments that the programs lacked economic substance,…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Gregory v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. Flora v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  3. Grodt & McKay Realty, Inc. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1981
  4. Seymour Silverman v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976
  5. Lewis Thurston Anderson and Clyde Velma Anderson, Lewis Thurston Anderson v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1957

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API