Legal Opinion

Little v. Territory

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided March 21, 1911No. 725PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Error from District Court, Ellis County; G. A. Brown, Judge. Action by the Territory of Oklahoma against D. F. Little and others. Judgment for the Territory, and defendants bring error.

1Opinion of the Court

KANE, J.,

This was an action on an appearance «onct, conditioned that if the principal, Little, shall make his appearance before the district court of Day county as a witness for the territory of Oklahoma in certain misdemeanor cases pending therein, said obligation to -be null and void.

The petition alleged, in substance, that said Little was held as a witness to testify in behalf of the territory in certain misdemeanor cases pending in the district court; that in order to regain his liberty said Little, as principal, and the defendants Walck, McQuigg, and Rader, as sureties, executed their…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Comfort v. KittleSupreme Court of Iowa · 1890
  2. Ex parte ShawCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In the Matter of the Petition of Leslie Bacon for Writ of Habeas Corpus v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1971
  2. In the Matter of Justin Alexander Marshall Justin Alexander Marshall v. State of IowaSupreme Court of Iowa · 2011
  3. Millet v. BilbySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
  4. Carpenters' Local Union No. 1028 v. StarkSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  5. Ex Parte RiddleCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1923

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API