Legal Opinion

State v. Bennett

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 23, 1966No. 249PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Peb Cueiam.

The defendant makes nine assignments of error but in his brief says “I am not familiar with the law on trial procedure and I am; therefore, unable to comment on these exceptions,” referring to exceptions five through nine inclusive. • In Rules of Practice in the Supreme Court, Section 28, 254 N.C. 810, these exceptions are “taken as abandoned” but we have, nevertheless, given them consideration and find no substantial error.

The remaining exceptions, one to four, relate to the defendant’s request that the court appoint counsel for him and the court’s refusal to do so. There is no…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. MorrisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969
  2. MacDonnel v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1967
  3. State v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1968
  4. State v. SherronSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API