Legal Opinion

Schoenith v. Automobile Club

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided July 6, 1987No. Docket No. 94536PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

Plaintiff appeals as of right from the August 4, 1986, circuit court order holding that the vehicle which plaintiff was working on when he was injured was not a motor vehicle for purposes of § 3101(2)(c) of the no-fault act, MCL 500.3101(2)(c); MSA 24.13101(2)(c).

The facts are undisputed. The parties submitted the case to the trial court upon a stipulated statement of facts. In September, 1983, plaintiff began working for Kling’s Automotive. In 1984, plaintiff decided to enter an area demolition derby scheduled for August 18, 1984. Kling’s Automotive gave plaintiff one of its cars, but…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Apperson v. Citizens Mutual InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1983
  2. Ebernickel v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1985
  3. Logan v. Commercial Carriers, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 1986

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Gividen v. Bristol West InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 2014
  2. Trevon Johnson v. Michigan Assigned Claims PlanMichigan Court of Appeals · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API