Legal Opinion

Rackley v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided January 30, 2014No. CR-12-157PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Cite as

2014 Ark. 39

SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS No. CR-12-157 MARCUS L. RACKLEY Opinion Delivered January 30, 2014 APPELLANT APPEAL FROM THE FAULKNER V. COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT [NO. 23CR-05-26] STATE OF ARKANSAS HONORABLE DAVID L. APPELLEE REYNOLDS, JUDGE REVERSED AND REMANDED. CLIFF HOOFMAN, Associate Justice Appellant Marcus Rackley appeals after a Faulkner County Circuit Court denied his petition filed pursuant to Arkansas Rule of Criminal Procedure 37.1. On appeal, appellant contends that trial counsel was ineffective (1) because he was simultaneously representing appellant and appellant’s wife…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  2. Cuyler v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Mickens v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  4. Howard v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2006
  5. Johnson v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1995

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Conley v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2014
  2. Thornton v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2014
  3. McClinton v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2018
  4. Montgomery v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2014
  5. Bridgeman v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2017

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API