Legal Opinion

Prodigy Centers/Atlanta No. 1 L.P. v. T-C Associates, Ltd.

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided July 29, 1998No. 95-9448Published

1Per curiam

In this ease, the government and T-C Associates (“TCA”) assert liens on a distribution to Prodigy Child Development Centers (“PCDC”) from a limited partnership. Although TCA obtained a judgment against PCDC before the government recorded its tax lien in 1993, the government argues that TCA’s judgment lien did not attach to PCDC’s partnership interest until TCA obtained a charging order in 1994, because PCDC’s partnership interest was a “chose in action.” After determining that the issue of whether the partnership interest was a chose in action was dispositive of this appeal but unsettled as a…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Prodigy Centers/Atlanta v. T-C AssociatesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1998
  2. Prodigy Centers/atlanta No. 1 L.P. Prodigy Centers No. 2 L.P. v. T-C Associates, Ltd., Etc., United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API