Legal Opinion
Johnson v. Bechtel Associates Professional Corp.
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided July 21, 1982No. Civ. A. 81-963PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
CORCORAN, District Judge.
On February 23, 1982 the defendants Bechtel Associates Professional Corporation, D. C. and Bechtel Civil and Minerals, Inc. (Bechtel) 1 moved this Court for summary judgment on grounds that this tort action against them is barred by Section 80 of the Compact (Compact) creating the Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority (WMATA). Plaintiff has opposed, and the parties have submitted an extensive series of briefs on the issue.
On May 17 and 18, 1982, a hearing was held to clarify factual issues. Following the hearing, the parties submitted…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Kelley v. Southern Pacific Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Rose v. SilverDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1978
- Petition of the United States of America and Mathiasen's Tanker Industries, Inc., for Exoneration From or Limitation of Liability as Owners of the U.S.N.S. Mission San Francisco, United States of America, in No. 15294. Mathiasen's Tanker Industries, Inc., in No. 15281Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1966
- Clem (Cleam) Caldwell v. Bechtel, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
- Smith v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1965
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Fisher v. Townsends, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1997
- Henderson v. Charles E. Smith Management, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1989
- Johnson v. Bechtel Associates Professional Corp.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1983
- Johnson v. Bechtel Associates Professional Corp.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1986
- Keener v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1986
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.