Bentley v. State

Shulman, Judge.

Defendant appeals the revocation of his probation, contending that the state failed to produce any evidence of his violation of the terms of his probation. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

1. The revocation of defendant’s probation was premised upon his conviction of the offense of theft by conversion. Even assuming, as defendant argues, that proof of defendant’s guilt was not established beyond a reasonable doubt, "[Revocation of probation does not require proof sufficient to sustain a criminal conviction. [Cit.]” Johnson v. State, 142 Ga. App. 124, 125 (235 SE2d…